With effect from the month of June 2010, he has been serving as a Manager in the Tata Tea Wear House drawing a monthly salary of Rs. The appellant (husband) on the other hand, had adduced evidence to the effect that he was initially working in a Tea Company as a Godown In-charge and was earning a monthly salary of Rs. Therefore, she did not have sufficient means to support herself.ĥ. She has also stated that it was a temporary post with the possibility of her services being terminated at any time. On the other hand, the respondent-petitioner had claimed that she was working as a contractual employee in a Grade-IV post in the K.K. It was also contended that the appellant owns a separate plot of land measuring 1 katha and is also a co-sharer of other ancestral land measuring 30 bighas. According to the respondent-petitioner, the appellant is also the owner of a plot of land measuring 1 katha, 6 lessa and he had constructed an Assam Type House thereupon, which had been let out on rent for a sum of Rs. That apart, he had income from other sources including business, which takes his gross monthly income to Rs. 15,146 per month, as on the month of September, 2014.

In support of her prayer, the respondent-petitioner had contended before the trial court that the appellant-opposite party was employed in a private firm called Genius Consultant Ltd. By the impugned order dated, the aforesaid application had been disposed of the learned court below by granting a sum of Rs. 54/2012 with a prayer to pass an order for granting permanent alimony for a sum of Rs.

However, it appears that the respondent had filed ah application registered and numbered as Misc. The decree of divorce has not been assailed by the respondent. It appears from the materials available on record that the marriage between the appellant (husband) and the respondent (wife) was dissolved by a decree of divorce passed by the learned Family Court on in connection with FC(Civil) Case No.

4,00,000 as permanent alimony, to be paid by the appellant to the respondent herein.ģ. 54/2012 arising out of FC(Civil) case No.

This appeal is directed against the order dated passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court-II, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, in Misc. Borah, learned counsel for the respondent.Ģ.

Genius consultant employee salary slip